linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3c2bfcc-b4cc-4330-8ee0-8e501345c89d@lucifer.local>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 14:35:05 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...mail.net>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for
 tool-generated content

On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:28:09AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 02:24:55PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> >
> > At any rate, even if you feel this is exactly the same, you surely therefore
> > cannot object to the suggested changes in [0] which would amount in your view
> > then to the same kind of dismissal you might give to a checkpatch --fix series?
>
> I have no problem with the suggested changes. I am especially happy that
> they say "As with the output of any tooling".

See? I can compromise... ;)