[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260108114205.GJ272712@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:42:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] sched/deadline: Fix potential race in
dl_add_task_root_domain()
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 02:57:00PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> On 11/25/25 3:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 25/11/25 11:26, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
> > >
> > > The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
> > >
> > > @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
> > > maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
> > > resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> > >
> > > Pingfan Liu (2):
> > > sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
> > > dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > > sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > >
> > > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > For both
> >
> > Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>
> Peter,
>
> Are these 2 patches eligible to be merged into the the scheduler branch of
> the tip tree? These are bug fixes to the deadline scheduler code.
Thanks for the ping -- just to double check, I need to take the v2
patches, that are posted inside the v7 thread?
I mean; I absolutely detest posting new series in the same thread as an
older series and then you go and do non-linear versioning just to make
it absolutely impossible to tell what's what. :-(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists