[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd3b7165-27ed-4f7d-abb5-4a60063260d8@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:01:32 +0100
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Atharv Dubey <atharvd440@...il.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: acpi: replace manual zero-initialization with
`pin_init::zeroed()`
On 1/8/26 3:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 4:52 PM Atharv Dubey <atharvd440@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Use `pin_init::zeroed()` instead of `core::mem::zeroed()` for initializing
>> `acpi_device_id`. This removes an explicit unsafe block and aligns ACPI
>> initialization with the pin-init conversion used across the Rust tree.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1189
>> Signed-off-by: Atharv Dubey <atharvd440@...il.com>
>
> A Rust-side ACK or equivalent would be welcome.
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists