[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <16DA3CAF-098A-444F-83C1-AF7BCE149937@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 11:18:53 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: clk: use the type-state pattern
> On 8 Jan 2026, at 10:57, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 9:07 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> AFAIU, encoding the state of the clock into the Clk type (and thus
>> forcing the structure that holds it) prevents that mutation. If not, we
>> should make it clearer (by expanding the doc maybe?) how such a pattern
>> can be supported.
>
> One possibility to consider in cases like this is whether supporting
> both cases differently makes sense, i.e. one for that covers
> easily/safely/... the usual "80%" of cases, and another "advanced" one
> (possibly unsafe etc.) for the rest.
>
> While it may be a bit more to maintain, it may pay itself off by
> making it easier to review the easy ones if the majority only need
> that etc.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
This is already the case. The devm_* stuff in the next patch covers a lot of
simpler drivers (who might simply want to enable the clk, perhaps with a given
rate), while the typestate pattern allows for more control when needed. There
will be users for both, IMHO.
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists