[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb6372ea-b7f7-4e87-91b5-09378f2dd526@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:42:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/30] arm64/fpsimd: Update FA64 and ZT0 enables when
loading SME state
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 04:19:34PM +0000, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Would it be worth adding a comment above the macro noting this
> difference from sve_cond_update_zcr_vq()? Something along the lines of
> 'Intentionally overwrites to ensure strict control of enable bits', to
> save future readers from getting confused...
Sure, makes sense. Possibly also rename it, I'll have a think.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists