[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0266f80f-cff9-4a65-9c2c-3663edb13cd0@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 11:22:13 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] spi: Documentation: add page on multi-lane support
On 1/8/26 10:43 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> On 01/08, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 1/8/26 6:44 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
>>> Actually, one more thing ...
>>>
>>> On 12/19, David Lechner wrote:
>>>> Add a new page to Documentation/spi/ describing how multi-lane SPI
>>>> support works. This is uncommon functionality so it deserves its own
>>>> documentation page.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
>>>> ---
>>> ...
>>>> +- :c:macro:`SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE`: Send or receive two different data words
>>>> + at the same time, one on each lane. This means that the buffer needs to be
>>>> + sized to hold data for all lanes. Data is interleaved in the buffer, with
>>>> + the first word corresponding to lane 0, the second to lane 1, and so on.
>>>> + Once the last lane is used, the next word in the buffer corresponds to lane
>>>> + 0 again. Accordingly, the buffer size must be a multiple of the number of
>>>> + lanes. This mode works for both reads and writes.
>>>> +
>>>> + Example::
>>>> +
>>>> + struct spi_transfer xfer = {
>>>> + .rx_buf = rx_buf,
>>>> + .len = 2,
>>>> + .multi_lane_mode = SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE,
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + spi_sync_transfer(spi, &xfer, 1);
>>>> +
>>>> + Each tx wire has a different data word sent simultaneously::
>>> In this example, the controller is reading data so the rx wires have different
>>> data word received?
>>
>> Yes, I tried to make that clear below by having a different value
>> for each.
>
> Yes, that part is clear. What came a bit odd when reading the doc is that the
> first two examples ilustrate the controller writing data to the peripheral and
> refer to buffers from controller's perspective ('sent over the tx wire',
> 'data is mirrored on each tx wire').
> IIUC, in this third example, the controller is reading data so we would describe
> it like 'Each rx read has a different data word read simultaneously', no?
>
Oh, I see. There is just a copy/paste typo.
>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + controller < data bits < peripheral
>>>> + ---------- ---------------- ----------
>>>> + SDI 0 0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1 SDO 0
>>>> + SDI 1 1-0-0-0-1-0-0-0 SDO 1
>>>> +
>>>> + After the transfer, ``rx_buf[0] == 0x11`` (word from SDO 0) and
>>>> + ``rx_buf[1] == 0x88`` (word from SDO 1).
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists