lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b18c07d-972a-41a8-823f-62a32e8f470a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:41:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ajay Kumar Nandam <ajay.nandam@....qualcomm.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
 Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
 Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com,
 ravi.hothi@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: defconfig: enable WCD937X codec driver as
 module

On 08/01/2026 08:34, Ajay Kumar Nandam wrote:
> Enable the Qualcomm WCD937X SoundWire codec driver as a
> loadable module in the arm64 defconfig. This is required for
> audio support on platforms using the WCD937X codec over the
> SoundWire interface.

Not a good reason. You wrote four lines of which all are redundant,
because you still did not prove we need to have support for WCD937x
Soundwire interface.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Nandam <ajay.nandam@....qualcomm.com>
> ---


Look incomplete.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240916052352.1819088-1-quic_mohs@quicinc.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010052646.2597418-1-quic_mohs@quicinc.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007082312.2136358-1-quic_mohs@quicinc.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=CONFIG_SND_SOC_WCD937X_SDW

But anyway, you did the same as all patches before, so it won't be
applied. There is really no point in sending the same three four times.
Nothing will change, no one will apply it, unless you finally fix the
address list.

You also Cc-ed here completely random addresses... E.g. why is this
relevant to Xilinx?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ