linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp values for PMI8994

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce7c86c0-6feb-48b1-9fd8-7ce3bb825428@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 10:21:02 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Kiran Gunda <quic_kgunda@...cinc.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Eugene Lepshy <fekz115@...il.com>,
        Gianluca Boiano <morf3089@...il.com>,
        Alejandro Tafalla <atafalla@...on.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp
 values for PMI8994

On 1/8/26 9:54 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/8/26 4:43 AM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>> Document ovp values supported by wled found in PMI8994.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> 
> I reviewed a version of this that said PMI8950, which is very much
> not the same..
> 
> Let me try and get some more docs to confirm or deny what you're
> saying..

PMI8994 indeed uses the same values as PMI8950, so let's keep my
review tag (but please be more careful about that when making
major changes between revisions in the future)

Konrad