[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260108115143.GK272712@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:51:43 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Use static_call for three smp_ops methods
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 08:14:03PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Busy hosts with RFS enabled can send more than 6,000,000 IPI
> per second. arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() is currently
> using an indirect call (because Xen can override the target).
>
> Indirect calls are expensive on some platforms with retpoline.
>
> This series converts three smp_ops methods to static_call
> infrastructure to remove common indirect calls.
>
> Eric Dumazet (3):
> x86/smp: Use static_call for arch_send_call_function_single_ipi()
> x86/smp: Use static_call for arch_smp_send_reschedule()
> x86/smp: Use static_call for arch_send_call_function_ipi()
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/xen/smp_hvm.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists