[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9413a995-9182-493e-a28a-6d2d3a17236b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 14:45:33 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
nao.horiguchi@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/mm: add memory failure selftests
On 1/7/26 10:37, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Introduce selftests to validate the functionality of memory failure.
> These tests help ensure that memory failure handling for anonymous
> pages, pagecaches pages works correctly, including proper SIGBUS
> delivery to user processes, page isolation, and recovery paths.
>
> Currently madvise syscall is used to inject memory failures. And only
> anonymous pages and pagecaches are tested. More test scenarios, e.g.
> hugetlb, shmem, thp, will be added. Also more memory failure injecting
> methods will be supported, e.g. APEI Error INJection, if required.
0day reports that these tests fail:
# # ------------------------
# # running ./memory-failure
# # ------------------------
# # TAP version 13
# # 1..6
# # # Starting 6 tests from 2 test cases.
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_hard.anon ...
# # # OK memory_failure.madv_hard.anon
# # ok 1 memory_failure.madv_hard.anon
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_hard.clean_pagecache ...
# # # memory-failure.c:166:clean_pagecache:Expected setjmp (1) == 0 (0)
# # # clean_pagecache: Test terminated by assertion
# # # FAIL memory_failure.madv_hard.clean_pagecache
# # not ok 2 memory_failure.madv_hard.clean_pagecache
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_hard.dirty_pagecache ...
# # # memory-failure.c:207:dirty_pagecache:Expected unpoison_memory(self->pfn) (-16) == 0 (0)
# # # dirty_pagecache: Test terminated by assertion
# # # FAIL memory_failure.madv_hard.dirty_pagecache
# # not ok 3 memory_failure.madv_hard.dirty_pagecache
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_soft.anon ...
# # # OK memory_failure.madv_soft.anon
# # ok 4 memory_failure.madv_soft.anon
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_soft.clean_pagecache ...
# # # memory-failure.c:282:clean_pagecache:Expected variant->inject(self, addr) (-1) == 0 (0)
# # # clean_pagecache: Test terminated by assertion
# # # FAIL memory_failure.madv_soft.clean_pagecache
# # not ok 5 memory_failure.madv_soft.clean_pagecache
# # # RUN memory_failure.madv_soft.dirty_pagecache ...
# # # memory-failure.c:319:dirty_pagecache:Expected variant->inject(self, addr) (-1) == 0 (0)
# # # dirty_pagecache: Test terminated by assertion
# # # FAIL memory_failure.madv_soft.dirty_pagecache
# # not ok 6 memory_failure.madv_soft.dirty_pagecache
# # # FAILED: 2 / 6 tests passed.
# # # Totals: pass:2 fail:4 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
# # [FAIL]
# not ok 71 memory-failure # exit=1
Can the test maybe not deal with running in certain environments (config options etc)?
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists