[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260109171711.7080e54c@kemnade.info>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:17:11 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Kevin Hilman
<khilman@...libre.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren
<tony@...mide.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: omap: ti,prm-inst: Convert to DT schema
On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 16:02:31 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 08:32:15PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Convert prm-inst binding to DT schema. Use the closest matching standard
> > node name in the example.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/prm-inst.txt | 31 ------------
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/ti,prm-inst.yaml | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> ti,omap-prm-inst.yaml to match the compatible. Otherwise, looks good.
>
or do we want to put it in arm/ti where also the board compatibles reside and
have bindings/arm/omap as the purgatory of the bindings.
BTW: the driver (drivers/pmdomain/ti/omap_prm.c) is listed under
TI KEYSTONE MULTICORE NAVIGATOR DRIVERS in MAINTAINERS although it is not keystone arch.
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists