linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: make pinctrl_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DFK76D6YF9HK.GCKCRXUU7ZZT@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:26:12 +0100
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, "Linus Walleij" <linusw@...nel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: make pinctrl_bind_pins() private

On Thu Jan 8, 2026 at 1:52 PM CET, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pinctrl_bind_pins() is only used by driver core (as it should). Move it
> out of the public header into base.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>

Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>

Should this go through the driver-core or pinctrl tree?