[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c63b2d4a-985c-442b-a171-e08059bdca3a@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 18:01:02 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Petr Tesarik" <ptesarik@...e.com>, "Yury Norov" <yury.norov@...il.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
"Matt Turner" <mattst88@...il.com>,
"Magnus Lindholm" <linmag7@...il.com>,
"Vineet Gupta" <vgupta@...nel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Chris Zankel" <chris@...kel.net>, "Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
"Patrik Jakobsson" <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.org>,
"Kuan-Wei Chiu" <visitorckw@...il.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"Johan Hedberg" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"Luiz Augusto von Dentz" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@...filter.org>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@...len.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bits: introduce ffs_val()
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026, at 17:37, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> + * Returns:
> + * least significant non-zero bit, 0 if all bits are zero
> + */
> +#define ffs_val(x) \
> +({ \
> + const typeof(x) val__ = (x); \
> + val__ & -val__; \
> +})
This looks good to me, but I'd suggest using 'const auto val__'
instead of typeof(), to reduce expanding complex arguments twice.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists