[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wgx4q3f4ktpoyq4u7rrquy7rs66hwidpr7dfxvw74w2xf53toe@kh3qy674des2>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 05:25:26 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: yuanjiey <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: robin.clark@....qualcomm.com, lumag@...nel.org, jesszhan0024@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com,
yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] drm/msm/dpu: Add Kaanapali SSPP sub-block
support
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 10:33:52AM +0800, yuanjiey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:46:18PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 04:56:57PM +0800, yuanjie yang wrote:
> > > From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
> > >
> > > Add support for Kaanapali platform SSPP sub-blocks, which
> > > introduce structural changes including register additions,
> > > removals, and relocations. Add the new common and rectangle
> > > blocks, and update register definitions and handling to
> > > ensure compatibility with DPU v13.0.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 14 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c | 14 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h | 4 +
> > > .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp_v13.c | 321 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_util.c | 18 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_util.h | 3 +
> > > 7 files changed, 371 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp_v13.c
>
> > > + c->ops.setup_sourceaddress = dpu_hw_sspp_setup_sourceaddress_v13;
> > > + c->ops.setup_solidfill = dpu_hw_sspp_setup_solidfill_v13;
> > > + c->ops.setup_pe = dpu_hw_sspp_setup_pe_config_v13;
> > > +
> >
> > > /* QOS_QOS_CTRL */
> > > #define QOS_QOS_CTRL_DANGER_SAFE_EN BIT(0)
> > > #define QOS_QOS_CTRL_DANGER_VBLANK_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
> > > @@ -475,6 +482,17 @@ void _dpu_hw_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c, u32 offset,
> > > cfg->danger_safe_en ? QOS_QOS_CTRL_DANGER_SAFE_EN : 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +void _dpu_hw_setup_qos_lut_v13(struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c,
> > > + const struct dpu_hw_qos_cfg *cfg)
> >
> > Will it be shared with other blocks (DS, WB)?
>
> yes, _dpu_hw_setup_qos_lut_v13 will be used in WB, in function dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut_v13.
>
> So maybe I should drop '_' rename _dpu_hw_setup_qos_lut_v13 --> dpu_hw_setup_qos_lut_v13 ?
Yes, please. As you are going to resend the series, could you please
also remove the function from the header?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists