lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DFK9990IPWNR.33A9FA4GSKZU0@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:04:00 +0100
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Boqun
 Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Björn Roy Baron
 <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
 "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
 "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] rust: pin-init: internal: init: add escape hatch
 for referencing initialized fields

On Fri Jan 9, 2026 at 2:58 PM CET, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Thu Jan 8, 2026 at 1:50 PM GMT, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> The initializer macro emits mutable references for already initialized
>> fields, which allows modifying or accessing them later in code blocks or
>> when initializing other fields. This behavior results in compiler errors
>> when combining with packed structs, since those do not permit creating
>> references to misaligned fields. For example:
>>
>>     #[repr(C, packed)]
>>     struct Foo {
>>         a: i8,
>>         b: i32,
>>     }
>>
>>     fn main() {
>>         let _ = init!(Foo { a: -42, b: 42 });
>>     }
>>
>> This will lead to an error like this:
>>
>>     error[E0793]: reference to field of packed struct is unaligned
>>       --> tests/ui/compile-fail/init/packed_struct.rs:10:13
>>        |
>>     10 |     let _ = init!(Foo { a: -42, b: 42 });
>>        |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>        |
>>        = note: this struct is 1-byte aligned, but the type of this field may require higher alignment
>>        = note: creating a misaligned reference is undefined behavior (even if that reference is never dereferenced)
>>        = help: copy the field contents to a local variable, or replace the reference with a raw pointer and use `read_unaligned`/`write_unaligned` (loads and stores via `*p` must be properly aligned even when using raw pointers)
>>        = note: this error originates in the macro `init` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
>>
>> This was requested by Janne Grunau [1] and will most certainly be used
>> by the kernel when we eventually end up with trying to initialize packed
>> structs.
>>
>> Thus add an initializer attribute `#[disable_initialized_field_access]`
>> that does what the name suggests: do not generate references to already
>> initialized fields.
>>
>> There is space for future work: add yet another attribute which can be
>> applied on fields of initializers that ask for said field to be made
>> accessible. We can add that when the need arises.
>
> An alternative might be checking if the specific field is actually used later
> and only generate references if so. Although, that might be "too much magic"?

Sounds like a good idea, I'll consider for a future series.

Cheers,
Benno

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ