[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176798671267.3432512.10099163174587731077.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 20:25:23 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rename system_wq and system_unbound_wq
On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:48:44 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> === Current situation: problems ===
>
> Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs: wq_unbound_cpumask is
> set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND the local CPU is selected.
>
> This leads to different scenarios if a work item is scheduled on an
> isolated CPU where "delay" value is 0 or greater then 0:
> schedule_delayed_work(, 0);
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] drm/rockchip: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
commit: 0650f4909af2bafe49322c91dd8dd0f68abfdf4f
[2/2] drm/rockchip: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
commit: ab8559d44de5750e03778c42311aec8dd41a61f5
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists