[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMC4fzKNpqO9LM3L1Yvdd5g6hMtXU2bsyw9m=3NL4Q22M5cA7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 15:27:24 -0500
From: Slade Watkins <sr@...dewatkins.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/634] 6.1.160-rc1 review
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 7:24 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.160 release.
> There are 634 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:19:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
6.1.160-rc1 built and run on my x86_64 test system (AMD Ryzen 9 9900X,
System76 thelio-mira-r4-n3). No errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <sr@...dewatkins.com>
Thanks,
Slade
Powered by blists - more mailing lists