lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWF12Wjv_MIKu6hQ@stanley.mountain>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 00:40:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tracing: Have tracer option be instance specific

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 10:23:01AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 18:23:31 +0300
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Steven,
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> > 
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> > 
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> > 
> > url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-Remove-dummy-options-and-flags/20251106-010511
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
> > patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105161935.545400234%40kernel.org
> 
> This is an old patch (v1) and v3 fixed this issue:
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251110234341.767135255@kernel.org/
> 
>  and v4 was applied and is now in mainline.
> 
> The patch you are reporting on was sent Nov 5th, the fix was sent Nov 10th.
> 
> Why is this sending reports about an old patch that is obsolete? Is there
> something wrong with your setup?
> 
> -- Steve
>

Yeah.  I appologize.  That was my bad.  I accidentally was looking
at old emails.  I think this was the only one I sent, though.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ