linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: quote: make rust-analyzer treat `core` and `std` as dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+tqQ4+kGwvT80j4TvFq+Dy9ztm+yu5nTT9TLAznG0OQ9F28ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 06:47:06 +0900
From: Jesung Yang <y.j3ms.n@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: quote: make rust-analyzer treat `core` and
 `std` as dependencies

On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 12:30 AM Jesung Yang <y.j3ms.n@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I think applying this series as-is and revisiting the `std` removal
> when we eventually upgrade `syn` (so that the PR effectively lands in
> our vendored `syn`) is also an option. If there's no upcoming upgrade
> planned for the near future, I would personally prefer this approach.

Ok, [1] has been merged to the upstream...

I don't have a strong opinion, but I still think it is more natural to
drop the `std` dependency when we actually bump our vendored `syn` to a
version that includes the merged changes.

Miguel, Tamir, what do you think?

[1] https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/pull/318

Best regards,
Jesung