linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 4/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for System Manager API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8459A8FB2A2AF57C2F506BCE8882A@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 06:31:38 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
	<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
	<festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, Daniel Baluta
	<daniel.baluta@....com>, "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for System
 Manager API

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for
> System Manager API
> 
> > >imx_rproc_sm_lmm_prepare()
> >
> > Add in V6:
> >         /*
> >          * If the remoteproc core can't start the LM, it will already
> > be
> 
> The remoteproc core starts a remote processor, which in this case is
> the M7.
> I'm not sure why you are referring to the logical machine (LM).

I was thinking to align with function name. I will use M7 in v6.

> >
> > I appreciate your detailed review and the code snippets you provided.
> > Please let me know if you'd prefer that I split the support for LMM
> > and CPU into separate patches in v6, or keep them combined as they
> are.
> 
> Please split.

ok. v6 will have them separated.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peng.