linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260109-viper-of-radical-correction-836d83@quoll>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:29:14 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, 
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	konradybcio@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: add native ipq9574
 support

On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 10:33:35PM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> Support loading remoteproc firmware on IPQ9574 with the qcom_q6v5_wcss
> driver. This firmware is usually used to run ath11k firmware and enable
> wifi with chips such as QCN5024.
> 
> When submitting v1, I learned that the firmware can also be loaded by
> the trustzone firmware. Since TZ is not shipped with the kernel, it
> makes sense to have the option of a native init sequence, as not all
> devices come with the latest TZ firmware.
> 
> Qualcomm tries to assure us that the TZ firmware will always do the
> right thing (TM), but I am not fully convinced, and believe there is
> justification for a native remoteproc loader. Besides, this series
> has improvements to the existing code.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - Improve bindings following review feedback

This is not specific enough.

With such vague changelog you could at least make it easy for us to
compare with older version, but not:

$ b4 diff '20260109043352.3072933-1-mr.nuke.me@...il.com'
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20260109043352.3072933-1-mr.nuke.me@...il.com/t.mbox.gz
Checking for older revisions
Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
Nothing matching that query.
---
Analyzing 10 messages in the thread
Could not find lower series to compare against.


Best regards,
Krzysztof