[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWKZvEW7rKFFwZLG@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 18:26:04 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: lizhi2@...incomputing.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com, weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock sampling
control
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 07:27:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > rx-internal-delay-ps:
> > - enum: [0, 200, 600, 1200, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200, 2400]
> > + enum: [0, 20, 60, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2400]
> >
> > tx-internal-delay-ps:
> > - enum: [0, 200, 600, 1200, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200, 2400]
> > + enum: [0, 20, 60, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2400]
>
> You need to add some text to the Changelog to indicate why this is
> safe to do, and will not cause any regressions for DT blobs already in
> use. Backwards compatibility is very important and needs to be
> addressed.
>
> > + eswin,rx-clk-invert:
> > + description:
> > + Invert the receive clock sampling polarity at the MAC input.
> > + This property may be used to compensate for SoC-specific
> > + receive clock to data skew and help ensure correct RX data
> > + sampling at high speed.
> > + type: boolean
>
> This does not make too much sense to me. The RGMII standard indicates
> sampling happens on both edges of the clock. The rising edge is for
> the lower 4 bits, the falling edge for the upper 4 bits. Flipping the
> polarity would only swap the nibbles around.
I'm going to ask a rather pertinent question. Why do we have this
eswin stuff in the kernel tree?
I've just been looking to see whether I can understand more about this,
and although I've discovered the TRM is available for the EIC7700:
https://github.com/eswincomputing/EIC7700X-SoC-Technical-Reference-Manual/releases
that isn't particularly helpful on its own.
There doesn't appear to be any device tree source files that describe
the hardware. The DT bindings that I can find seem to describe only
ethernet and USB. describe the ethernet and USB, and maybe sdhci.
I was looking for something that would lead me to what this
eswin,hsp-sp-csr thing is, but that doesn't seem to exist in our
DT binding documentation, nor does greping for "hsp.sp.csr" in
arch/*/boot/dts find anything.
So, we can't know what this "hsp" thing is to even know where to look
in the 80MiB of PDF documentation.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists