[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260110194219.GCaWKrmyJCU_y3vfDD@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 20:42:19 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 30/32] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create
architecture specific debugfs area
On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 11:13:40AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Please drop patches 30, 31, and the debugfs hunk to Documentation from patch 32
> while I look at options. The debugfs bits aren't needed for normal
> operation, just for debugging if things don't appear to be working as
> expected. No need to hold up inclusion waiting for a solution.
>
> Telemetry based events tied to RMIDs are new in Clearwater Forest. I
> have line of sight to a second platorm. But extrapolating from two
> data points to decide on a stable ABI seems very risky.
Ok, makes sense.
I've pushed out the branch, you could have a look and lemme know whether
something's still amiss.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists