[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLcVUMJqTKnYpP_r4Z16Sw1pVcQ=HCFJG0bY_O=q3psVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 18:25:32 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>, Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>, Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] dt-bindings: mtd: Ensure partition node properties
are documented
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 3:36 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 11:53:16AM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > Partition nodes without a compatible have no restrictions on additional
> > properties. Fix this by ensuring 'unevaluatedProperties' is set when
> > there's no compatible property. If there is a compatible property, then
> > there should be a specific schema for it which will enforce
> > 'unevaluatedProperties'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml | 8 ++------
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml | 2 +-
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
> > .../mtd/partitions/tplink,safeloader-partitions.yaml | 2 +-
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/u-boot.yaml | 2 +-
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.yaml | 2 +-
> > 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml
> > index e56dba83f00a..5a2d06c96c0d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml
> > @@ -36,12 +36,8 @@ properties:
> > - compatible
> >
> > patternProperties:
> > - "@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > - $ref: partitions/partition.yaml
> > - deprecated: true
> > -
> > - "^partition@[0-9a-f]+":
> > - $ref: partitions/partition.yaml
> > + "(^partition)?@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > + $ref: /schemas/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml#/$defs/partition-node
> > deprecated: true
>
> This makes partition@ deprecated. Looks unintended or needds commit msg
> explanation.
No, the only change here is I combined the entries. "partition@" is
deprecated when not under "partitions" node.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists