[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260111115751.7269c7b0@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:57:51 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Sean Anderson
<sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] spi: add multi-lane support
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:32:08 -0600
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> This series is adding support for SPI controllers and peripherals that
> have multiple SPI data lanes (data lanes being independent sets of
> SDI/SDO lines, each with their own serializer/deserializer).
>
This seems to be in a pretty good state now, so I'm guessing v5 will merge.
So with that in mind, add something to cover letter of v5 saying how you
think that is best done. I'm thinking probably Mark does an immutable branch
with 1-7 and I merge that + 8 and 9 via IIO.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists