[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5e47fe91-e150-4b5d-a669-3a7beeea4f03@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 18:18:55 +0530
From: "Bharadwaj Raju" <bharadwaj.raju@...hinesoul.in>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Weidong Wang" <wangweidong.a@...nic.com>
Cc: "Bhushan Shah" <bhushan.shah@...hinesoul.in>,
"Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: document dvdd-supply property for
awinic,aw88261
On Sun, 11 Jan 2026, at 5:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Why? Was it missing? Why require it, which is an ABI break (or is not?)?
> Why is ABI break allowed or what is its impact?
Right now there are no users of aw88261 in the kernel device tree sources.
This patch is part of an effort to mainline the FairPhone 5, for which we
will add the first use of this compatible, and there we need to specify
dvdd-supply for this chip's power supply.
Since there are no present users, I thought it was OK to add a new required
property. If not, I can make it optional.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists