lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWPUwCbFoIItG7n3@google.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:50:08 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
	mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	sre@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
	eleanor15x@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: input:
 google,goldfish-events-keypad: Convert to DT schema

Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 09:23:33AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 08:08:33AM +0000, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    keypad@...0000 {
> > +        compatible = "google,goldfish-events-keypad";
> > +        reg = <0x9040000 0x1000>;
> > +        interrupts = <0x5>;
> 
> Same comment as before. It applies everywhere, btw.

Oops, I actually had a local fixup for this but forgot to apply it
before sending. Sorry about that.

On a side note, none of your replies regarding v2 appeared in my inbox
or spam folder. I had to retrieve this message content from the lore
web interface to reply. However, your replies to v1 arrived without any
issues.

The only difference I noticed is the sender address:
v1 came from <krzk@...nel.org>,
while v2 came from <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>.
I suspect gmail might be silently dropping the latter due to some check?

I'm not familiar with the email protocols, but perhaps it really is time
for me to start looking for a gmail alternative... even though I see many
entries in MAINTAINERS still using gmail.com addresses.

Regards,
Kuan-Wei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ