lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgRi+STUapakKV4XrGVD8B6LSetGC8Ya+Ubiki7dOQyGUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 01:00:57 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>, FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@...xa.com>, 
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>, Yongbo Zhang <giraffesnn123@...il.com>, 
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:USB TYPEC CLASS" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b-5bp-5t: Fix
 USB host phy-supply on Rock 5b-5bp-5t SbC

Hi Sebastian,

I am having difficulty articulating my thoughts clearly right now;
please bear with me as I try to explain.

On Sat, 10 Jan 2026 at 05:03, Sebastian Reichel
<sebastian.reichel@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 12:25:12PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Thanks for your review comments.
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 at 19:35, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 03, 2026 at 02:01:18PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > > > The USB host USB2 and USB3 on the Rock 5B, 5BP, and 5T is powered by the
> > > > USB_HOST_PWREN_H gpio pin which is used to enable vcc5v0_host host
> > > > regulator which ensures proper power sequencing and management for onboard
> > > > Double-USB-HOST.
> > > >
> > > > Update the u2phy2_host node to reference the correct phy-supply.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > u2phy2_host is connected to an onboard USB hub chip, which is
> > > powered by &vcc5v0_sys as the comment says.
> > >
> > > You can see this on page 9 of the v1.45 ROCK 5B schematics (page
> > > name USB2HUB). The usb hub chip uses VCC5V0_SYS + VCC_3V3_S0 and is
> > > connected to USB20_HOST0_DP, USB20_HOST0_DM. The related USB
> > > controller for that in the upstream DT is &usb_host0_ehci, which
> > > in turn is using &u2phy2_host. Thus at least for the ROCK 5B the
> > > existing DT is correct. Properly describing the downstream port
> > > VBUS regulator would require something like the following series:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250911-v6-16-topic-usb-onboard-dev-v4-0-1af288125d74@pengutronix.de/
> > >
> > Actually, the Radxa Rock 5 B doesn't have an onboard USB hub chip.
>
> Seriously? I provided the exact page for the hub chip in the
> schematics and it's easily visisble in lsusb too.
>
My apologies for the confusion. To clarify, this board lacks a USB hub
chip that matches the
detected USB IDs and is capable of powering both USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 interfaces.

[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/microchip%2Cusb2514.yaml

This is the reason we have a separate power regulator for USB 2.0 and
USB 3.0 ports
and Type-C controllers.

There is a USB2HUB -> U90078 FE1.1s_QFN chip (page 27) in the schematics,
It's probably connected to the PCIE M.2 NGFF for Bluetooth

[2] https://www.snapeda.com/parts/FE1.1s-BQFN24B/Terminus-Tech/datasheet/

$ lsusb -tv
/:  Bus 001.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-platform/1p, 480M
    ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    |__ Port 001: Dev 002, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
        ID 1a40:0101 Terminus Technology Inc. Hub
        |__ Port 003: Dev 003, If 0, Class=Wireless, Driver=btusb, 12M
            ID 8087:0a2b Intel Corp. Bluetooth wireless interface
        |__ Port 003: Dev 003, If 1, Class=Wireless, Driver=btusb, 12M
            ID 8087:0a2b Intel Corp. Bluetooth wireless interface
/:  Bus 002.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=ohci-platform/1p, 12M
    ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
/:  Bus 003.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-platform/1p, 480M
    ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
/:  Bus 004.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=ohci-platform/1p, 12M
    ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
/:  Bus 005.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci-hcd/1p, 480M
    ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
/:  Bus 006.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci-hcd/1p, 5000M
    ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
/:  Bus 007.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci-hcd/1p, 480M
    ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
/:  Bus 008.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci-hcd/1p, 5000M
    ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub

> I don't want to waste my time and expect a certain level of quality
> and this is certainly way below it...

Please accept my apologies for the miscommunication.

Could you check the enable status of the USB_HOST_PWREN_H pin in the schematics?

USB_HOST_PWREN_H -> VCC5V0_USB20_HOST0 / VCC5V0_USB20_HOST2
USB_HOST_PWREN_H -> VCC5V0_USB30_HOST0 / VCC5V0_USB30_HOST1

My current patch is trying to address this issue.

>
> -- Sebastian

Thanks
-Anand

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ