[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112100006.7db6d31d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:00:06 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Josh Poimboeuf
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Ard Biesheuvel
<ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Rust files to STATIC BRANCH/CALL and
TRACING
On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:36:29 +0100
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:32 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm proposing to include them under the existing entries, as that seems
> > like the most obvious place to include them. However, there are multiple
> > ways to do this. If you prefer to have them elsewhere, I would also be
> > happy to create a new entry with me as maintaining them, or I'm also
> > willing to be listed as R: under the entry. Regardless of how we list
> > them in MAINTAINERS, I will be around if anything comes up. Let me know
> > what you all prefer.
>
> I think this was meant to go after the `---`?
>
> Whatever Steven et al. are happy with, this looks fine, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>
I guess the question is are those with expertise on the list of people to
Cc?
I think it may be better to have a separate section for RUST so that the
rust maintainers can be included in the M: part too. Perhaps:
STATIC BRANCH/CALL (RUST)
and
TRACING (RUST)
And have the M of the other sections be R here?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists