linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd053cff-af8f-4378-9550-9f99f91cea20@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:30:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
 Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
 Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
 Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document
 RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs

On 12/01/2026 15:04, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>   - if:
>       properties:
>         compatible:
>           contains:
>             # SoCs WITH resets but WITHOUT reset-names
>             enum:
>               - renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd
>               - renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd
>     then:
>       required:
>         - resets
>       properties:
>         reset-names: false
> 

Yes, although now I wonder why do you have such case... There are no
benefits in disallowing reset-names, even for single entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof