[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48f00a0b-667b-4aa0-93a2-e1045e20e309@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:32:42 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rodrigo Alencar <455.rodrigo.alencar@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@...log.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add adf41513
On 12/01/2026 11:04, Rodrigo Alencar wrote:
>>
>> One example - more complete, so the next one - is enough. They do not
>> differ.
>>
>
> Not sure I undestood this message:
> - are those examples 'enough' as the second one is 'more complete'?
> - do I need to change the second example to be 'more complete',
> because 'they do not differ'?
> - do I need to create 'one example' 'more complete', apart from the existing ones?
Just have one example, e.g. the second one.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists