[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6xnoqml2iwipcfm2byrswm7xmhehzbjbdgeets7qpyiez6le6z@vrtcqoaaqwgx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:11:57 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>,
"Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] software node: Implement device_get_match_data
fwnode callback
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 08:37:02AM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 01:49:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > I really do not want to see this patch without very good justification
> > > (note, there were at least two attempts in the past to add this stuff
> > > and no-one was merged, have you studied those cases?).
> > >
> >
> > Yes I did. I didn't put the above justification in the cover letter, as it was
> > already overwhelmed with too much information regarding the connector node.
> > Maybe I should've added it in the comments section of this patch. But I didn't
> > know how to do that with b4.
>
> You can just amend the commit directly and put comments under "---". They
> will be preserved when email is sent, but won't be applied when the maintainer
> pulls the series.
>
Ah, thanks for the info!
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists