[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112042841.51799-3-sheetal@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:58:40 +0530
From: "Sheetal ." <sheetal@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, "Thierry
Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mohan kumar <mkumard@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Sheetal
<sheetal@...dia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] regmap: Add KUnit test for flat_cache_default_is_zero
From: Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
Add KUnit test coverage for the flat_cache_default_is_zero flag. The
test verifies that when the flag is set:
- Writes in cache_only mode work before registers are marked valid
- Writes in cache_only mode work after registers are marked valid
- After regcache_mark_dirty() and regcache_sync(), cached values
are correctly written to hardware
- Reads return the cached values
Test command:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run regmap
Test results:
============= flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =============
[PASSED] flat-default @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default fast I/O @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2001
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2002
========= [PASSED] flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =========
Signed-off-by: Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index f6fc5ed016da..7eec555c449c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_only_list[] = {
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(real_cache_types_only, real_cache_types_only_list, param_to_desc);
+static const struct regmap_test_param flat_cache_types_list[] = {
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2001 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2002 },
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(flat_cache_types, flat_cache_types_list, param_to_desc);
+
static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_list[] = {
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
@@ -1517,6 +1526,83 @@ static void cache_present(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, regcache_reg_cached(map, param->from_reg + i));
}
+/*
+ * Test flat_cache_default_is_zero flag behavior.
+ *
+ * When this flag is set on REGCACHE_FLAT, registers not in reg_defaults
+ * are treated as having a default value of zero. This allows drivers to
+ * avoid maintaining large reg_defaults arrays for hardware with zero
+ * power-on-reset values.
+ */
+static void flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+ config.flat_cache_default_is_zero = true;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ data->read[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ }
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode before registers are marked valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x100));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ /* Verify reads return cached values */
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &val));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, val);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode after registers are already valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x200));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x200, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+}
+
static void cache_write_zero(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
@@ -2078,6 +2164,7 @@ static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_present, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_write_zero, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_range_window_reg, real_cache_types_only_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag, flat_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults_single, raw_test_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults, raw_test_types_gen_params),
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists