[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWVs2gVB418WiMVa@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:51:22 -0500
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: david.laight.linux@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/44] fs: use min() or umin() instead of min_t()
Hi David,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:41:26PM +0000, david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
>
> min_t(unsigned int, a, b) casts an 'unsigned long' to 'unsigned int'.
> Use min(a, b) instead as it promotes any 'unsigned int' to 'unsigned long'
> and so cannot discard significant bits.
>
> A couple of places need umin() because of loops like:
> nfolios = DIV_ROUND_UP(ret + start, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> for (i = 0; i < nfolios; i++) {
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(pages[i]);
> ...
> unsigned int len = umin(ret, PAGE_SIZE - start);
> ...
> ret -= len;
> ...
> }
> where the compiler doesn't track things well enough to know that
> 'ret' is never negative.
>
> The alternate loop:
> for (i = 0; ret > 0; i++) {
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(pages[i]);
> ...
> unsigned int len = min(ret, PAGE_SIZE - start);
> ...
> ret -= len;
> ...
> }
> would be equivalent and doesn't need 'nfolios'.
>
> Most of the 'unsigned long' actually come from PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Detected by an extra check added to min_t().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
When doing a mips cross compile from an arm64 host
(via ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips64-linux-gnu- make), the following
build error occurs in linux-next and goes away when I revert this
commit.
In file included from <command-line>:
In function ‘fuse_wr_pages’,
inlined from ‘fuse_perform_write’ at fs/fuse/file.c:1347:27:
././include/linux/compiler_types.h:667:45: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_405’ declared with attribute error: min(((pos + len
- 1) >> 12) - (pos >> 12) + 1, max_pages) signedness error
667 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
././include/linux/compiler_types.h:648:25: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
648 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^~~~~~
././include/linux/compiler_types.h:667:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
667 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/minmax.h:93:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
93 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__types_ok(ux, uy), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/minmax.h:98:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__careful_cmp_once’
98 | __careful_cmp_once(op, x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(x_), __UNIQUE_ID(y_))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/minmax.h:105:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘__careful_cmp’
105 | #define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(min, x, y)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/fuse/file.c:1326:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘min’
1326 | return min(((pos + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - (pos >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1,
| ^~~
This is on a cento-stream-10 host running
gcc version 14.3.1 20250617 (Red Hat 14.3.1-2) (GCC). I didn't look into
this in detail, and I'm not entirely sure what the correct fix here
should be.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists