[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112063039.2968980-4-keerthana.kalyanasundaram@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:30:39 +0000
From: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@...adcom.com>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
dsahern@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
borisp@...dia.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
sashal@...nel.org,
leitao@...ian.org,
kuniyu@...zon.com,
willemb@...gle.com,
jramaseu@...hat.com,
aviadye@...lanox.com,
ilyal@...lanox.com,
ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com,
vamsi-krishna.brahmajosyula@...adcom.com,
yin.ding@...adcom.com,
tapas.kundu@...adcom.com,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@...adcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5.10.y 3/3] tls: Use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu() in get_netdev_for_sock().
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit c65f27b9c3be2269918e1cbad6d8884741f835c5 ]
get_netdev_for_sock() is called during setsockopt(),
so not under RCU.
Using sk_dst_get(sk)->dev could trigger UAF.
Let's use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu().
Note that the only ->ndo_sk_get_lower_dev() user is
bond_sk_get_lower_dev(), which uses RCU.
Fixes: e8f69799810c ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250916214758.650211-6-kuniyu@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
[ Keerthana: Backported the patch to v5.10.y ]
Signed-off-by: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@...adcom.com>
---
net/tls/tls_device.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
index 8e89ff403073..8cf4e1651b0c 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
@@ -113,17 +113,19 @@ static void tls_device_queue_ctx_destruction(struct tls_context *ctx)
/* We assume that the socket is already connected */
static struct net_device *get_netdev_for_sock(struct sock *sk)
{
- struct dst_entry *dst = sk_dst_get(sk);
- struct net_device *netdev = NULL;
+ struct net_device *dev, *lowest_dev = NULL;
+ struct dst_entry *dst;
- if (likely(dst)) {
- netdev = dst->dev;
- dev_hold(netdev);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
+ dev = dst ? dst_dev_rcu(dst) : NULL;
+ if (likely(dev)) {
+ lowest_dev = netdev_sk_get_lowest_dev(dev, sk);
+ dev_hold(lowest_dev);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- dst_release(dst);
-
- return netdev;
+ return lowest_dev;
}
static void destroy_record(struct tls_record_info *record)
--
2.43.7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists