[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112010740.186248-1-chintanlike@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 17:07:39 -0800
From: Chintan Patel <chintanlike@...il.com>
To: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de,
andy@...nel.org,
deller@....de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Chintan Patel <chintanlike@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5] staging: fbtft: use dev_of_fbinfo() instead of info->dev
This fixes commit
a06d03f9f238 ("staging: fbtft: Make FB_DEVICE dependency optional")
from my previous v4 series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20260107044258.528624-1-chintanlike@gmail.com/
All direct accesses to info->dev or fb_info->dev are replaced with
dev_of_fbinfo() helper, improving readability and ensuring
compilation succeeds when CONFIG_FB_DEVICE=n.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601110740.Y9XK5HtN-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintanlike@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index 8a5ccc8ae0a1..309e81d7d208 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -364,8 +364,9 @@ static int fbtft_fb_setcolreg(unsigned int regno, unsigned int red,
{
unsigned int val;
int ret = 1;
+ struct device *dev = dev_of_fbinfo(info);
- dev_dbg(info->dev,
+ dev_dbg(dev,
"%s(regno=%u, red=0x%X, green=0x%X, blue=0x%X, trans=0x%X)\n",
__func__, regno, red, green, blue, transp);
@@ -389,9 +390,10 @@ static int fbtft_fb_setcolreg(unsigned int regno, unsigned int red,
static int fbtft_fb_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
{
struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
+ struct device *dev = dev_of_fbinfo(info);
int ret = -EINVAL;
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "%s(blank=%d)\n",
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s(blank=%d)\n",
__func__, blank);
if (!par->fbtftops.blank)
@@ -739,6 +741,7 @@ int fbtft_register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
char text2[50] = "";
struct fbtft_par *par = fb_info->par;
struct spi_device *spi = par->spi;
+ struct device *dev = dev_of_fbinfo(fb_info);
/* sanity checks */
if (!par->fbtftops.init_display) {
@@ -793,7 +796,7 @@ int fbtft_register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
if (spi)
sprintf(text2, ", spi%d.%d at %d MHz", spi->controller->bus_num,
spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0), spi->max_speed_hz / 1000000);
- dev_info(fb_info->dev,
+ dev_info(dev,
"%s frame buffer, %dx%d, %d KiB video memory%s, fps=%lu%s\n",
fb_info->fix.id, fb_info->var.xres, fb_info->var.yres,
fb_info->fix.smem_len >> 10, text1,
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists