[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5EvWVhRXoxLbsV5G7DEWLnVGRMCC1Qtd02fD8jh35VRqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:49:06 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: Allow single
vdo/mmsys endpoint
On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:39 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> The hardware supports using just a single output while leaving all
> of the others unconfigured (disabled), but the binding did not
> really allow specifying a single endpoint@0, because in this case
> one must either:
> - Call the subnode `endpoint` and not declare any address and/or
> size cells; or
> - Call the subnode `endpoint@0` and have at least one more other
> endpoint(@1 or @2), and declare address/size cells.
>
> Allow specifying a single `endpoint` subnode, without the `@0`
> implicit suffix to suppress warnings happening on this kind of
> valid usecase.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Looks correct to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists