[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF7iaXC-KEp_Mq0pFWyVGi1R6Zd_REx-SBBMuhPZwa8eYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:21:51 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace use of system_wq with tlb_inval->fence_signal_wq
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 7:54 PM Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com> wrote:
>
> I hate to be nitpicky but this name / kernel doc isn't great.
>
> How about:
>
> /** @timeout_wq: schedules TLB invalidation fence timeouts */
> struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq;
>
> Functionality everything in this patch looks correct.
Hi,
Sure sounds good, I will send the v3.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists