lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112083846.GA24143@k08j02272.eu95sqa>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:38:46 +0800
From: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@...gle.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bug: Handle __WARN_printf() trap in
 early_fixup_exception()

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 08:44:28AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 11:47:37AM +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> > The commit 5b472b6e5bd9 ("x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()")
> > implemented __WARN_printf(), which changed the mechanism to use UD1
> > instead of UD2. However, it only handles the trap in the runtime IDT
> > handler, while the early booting IDT handler lacks this handling. As a
> > result, the usage of WARN() before the runtime IDT setup can lead to
> > kernel crashes. 
> 
> Urgh, indeed. Clearly I don't see many early WARNs :/
>
Uh, I found this accidentally while I was trying to clean up the
early_ioremap debug printing, where it uses WARN() for dumpstack.

> > Since KMSAN is enabled after the runtime IDT setup, it
> > is safe to use handle_bug() directly in early_fixup_exception() to
> > address this issue.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand this. Should it not be that KMSAN is enabled
> *before* early IDT to make this a non-issue?
>
I see that handle_bug() would call kmsan_unpoison_entry_regs(), and I
assume that it should be a NOP before kmsan_init_runtime(). Therefore, I
think it's safe to use handle_bug() directly in early_fixup_exception().
Additionally, I note that kmsan_init_runtime() is called after
trap_init(), which is why I described the commit message this way.

Thanks!

> > Fixes: 5b472b6e5bd9 ("x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()")
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 2 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c      | 2 +-
> >  arch/x86/mm/extable.c        | 7 ++-----
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
> > index 869b88061801..3f24cc472ce9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ extern int ibt_selftest_noendbr(void);
> >  void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +noinstr bool handle_bug(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > +
> >  static inline int get_si_code(unsigned long condition)
> >  {
> >  	if (condition & DR_STEP)
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > index bcf1dedc1d00..aca1eca5daff 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  		      ILL_ILLOPN, error_get_trap_addr(regs));
> >  }
> >  
> > -static noinstr bool handle_bug(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +noinstr bool handle_bug(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long addr = regs->ip;
> >  	bool handled = false;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> > index 2fdc1f1f5adb..6b9ff1c6cafa 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> > @@ -411,14 +411,11 @@ void __init early_fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	if (trapnr == X86_TRAP_UD) {
> > -		if (report_bug(regs->ip, regs) == BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN) {
> > -			/* Skip the ud2. */
> > -			regs->ip += LEN_UD2;
> > +		if (handle_bug(regs))
> >  			return;
> > -		}
> >  
> >  		/*
> > -		 * If this was a BUG and report_bug returns or if this
> > +		 * If this was a BUG and handle_bug returns or if this
> >  		 * was just a normal #UD, we want to continue onward and
> >  		 * crash.
> >  		 */
> > 
> > base-commit: b7dccac786071bba98b0d834c517fd44a22c50f9
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ