[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026011212-strongbox-snore-e1cc@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:31:28 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Karthikey Kadati <karthikey3608@...il.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Unix Antigravity <unix.antigravity@...t.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: sm750fb: Convert sw_i2c_read_sda to return
bool
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 03:55:02PM +0530, Karthikey Kadati wrote:
> The sw_i2c_read_sda function currently returns unsigned char (1 or 0).
>
> Standardize it to return bool (true or false) to match kernel standards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Unix Antigravity <unix.antigravity@...t.com>
You have to be a legal person to sign off on a patch, with a valid email
address :(
Also, your patches were a patch series, but not connected to each other,
nor were they related. I see them in my inbox as:
1 T Jan 12 Karthikey Kadat (2.0K) [PATCH 4/4] staging: atomisp: Replace ia_css_region with v4l2_rect
2 T Jan 12 Karthikey Kadat (2.4K) [PATCH 2/4] staging: octeon: Remove port status typedefs
3 T Jan 12 Karthikey Kadat (9.1K) [PATCH 3/4] staging: atomisp: Remove input_system typedefs
4 T Jan 12 Karthikey Kadat (1.1K) [PATCH 1/4] staging: sm750fb: Convert sw_i2c_read_sda to return bool
But not threaded, so that's a bit odd. Perhaps you didn't use git
send-email for these?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists