[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35084885-09dc-4255-8ec9-ba23c3a2a925@web.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:55:15 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...el.com,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: soundwire: bus: fix off-by-one when allocating slave IDs
> Sorry, if that was unclear. The link is a real link to the documentation
> which says:
>
> - The body of the explanation, line wrapped at 75 columns, which will
> be copied to the permanent changelog to describe this patch.
>
> The rules that we write down are simplified guidelines which are designed
> to be easy explain. 75 is the upper bound where checkpatch will complain.
…
Can we benefit a bit more from this system configuration setting
instead of performing word wrapping at around the column 67 here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists