[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112-determined-misty-porpoise-c77a2a@quoll>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:51:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: remove the reset-tn48m driver
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:16:44AM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 8:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/01/2026 07:49, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > The reset-tn48m driver is useless without the simple-mfd parent, which
> > > is not present in the kernel tree, so remove it and references to it.
> >
> > I don't understand that sentence. simple-mfd is present in the kernel
> > tree, so the condition is clearly false.
> >
> > Driver has proper instantiation mechanism, thus all out of tree users
> > can properly use it and there is no ever requirement to have in-tree
> > DTS. Otherwise you would remove half of the kernel drivers...
>
> The simple-mfd driver itself exists, but all of the TN48M drivers
> depend on a symbol
> that sadly, was reverted in [1], and thus you cannot build them, nor
> are they instantiated without it.
Ah, so missing is MFD_TN48M_CPLD. You should just say that driver is
impossible to build outside of compile testing, thus it is unusable.
simple-mfd is rather confusing in this context, because itself exists.
>
> I am sad that was the case as the drivers work, and they were planned
> for expansion for more
> switch models but it ended up in this limbo state.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20260109&id=540e6a8114d0
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
> >
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5cd3921d16b6 ("reset: Add Delta TN48M CPLD reset controller")
> >
> > No bug to be fixed. Or at least not explained yet...
In that case I would say fixed commit is what you pointed:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20260109&id=540e6a8114d0
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists