[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWYrdoF8Z97UkDV4@vaman>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:54:38 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...el.com,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: soundwire: bus: fix off-by-one when allocating slave IDs
On 12-01-26, 11:13, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 12/01/2026 10:55 am, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Sorry, if that was unclear. The link is a real link to the documentation
> > > which says:
> > >
> > > - The body of the explanation, line wrapped at 75 columns, which will
> > > be copied to the permanent changelog to describe this patch.
> > >
> > > The rules that we write down are simplified guidelines which are designed
> > > to be easy explain. 75 is the upper bound where checkpatch will complain.
> > …
> >
> > Can we benefit a bit more from this system configuration setting
> Why is this wrapped at column 64?
Good one :-)
I have a tendency to not look into a lot of things our friend is asking
for, seems to be not worth your time!
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists