[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260113-module-hashes-v4-1-0b932db9b56b@weissschuh.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 13:28:45 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>, Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@....cyber.gouv.fr>,
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>, Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@...xmox.com>,
Arnout Engelen <arnout@...t.net>, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@...reri.org>,
kpcyrd <kpcyrd@...hlinux.org>, Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>,
Câju Mihai-Drosi <mcaju95@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/17] module: Only declare set_module_sig_enforced when
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG=y
From: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
Currently if set_module_sig_enforced is called with CONFIG_MODULE_SIG=n
e.g. [1], it can lead to a linking error,
ld: security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.o: in function `ima_appraise_measurement':
security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:587:(.text+0xbbb): undefined reference to `set_module_sig_enforced'
This happens because the actual implementation of
set_module_sig_enforced comes from CONFIG_MODULE_SIG but both the
function declaration and the empty stub definition are tied to
CONFIG_MODULES.
So bind set_module_sig_enforced to CONFIG_MODULE_SIG instead. This
allows (future) users to call set_module_sig_enforced directly without
the "if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG)" safeguard.
Note this issue hasn't caused a real problem because all current callers
of set_module_sig_enforced e.g. security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
use "if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG)" safeguard.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250928030358.3873311-1-coxu@redhat.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
---
>From modules/modules-next
---
include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index d80c3ea57472..f288ca5cd95b 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -770,8 +770,6 @@ static inline bool is_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)
#endif
}
-void set_module_sig_enforced(void);
-
void module_for_each_mod(int(*func)(struct module *mod, void *data), void *data);
#else /* !CONFIG_MODULES... */
@@ -866,10 +864,6 @@ static inline bool module_requested_async_probing(struct module *module)
}
-static inline void set_module_sig_enforced(void)
-{
-}
-
/* Dereference module function descriptor */
static inline
void *dereference_module_function_descriptor(struct module *mod, void *ptr)
@@ -925,6 +919,8 @@ static inline bool retpoline_module_ok(bool has_retpoline)
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
bool is_module_sig_enforced(void);
+void set_module_sig_enforced(void);
+
static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
{
return module->sig_ok;
@@ -935,6 +931,10 @@ static inline bool is_module_sig_enforced(void)
return false;
}
+static inline void set_module_sig_enforced(void)
+{
+}
+
static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
{
return true;
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists