linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 04/30] docs: reporting-issues: add proper appendix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <419c402e-abd8-4f00-b549-cfd3ec1e2e03@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:38:21 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/30] docs: reporting-issues: add proper appendix

On 10/27/25 18:38, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> writes:
> 
>> Turn the "Why some bugs remain unfixed and some report are ignored"
>> section into a proper appendix while improving it slightly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
>> ---
>>  .../admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst          | 102 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> Some comments below, 

Many thx, will all be addressed in the next version.

> but I have to ask: do we really need this section at all? 
Will answer that in a reply to 5/30, which asked the same.

Ciao, Thorsten