linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/5] I2C Mux per channel bus speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aWZj7_i-hnfFOmJ3@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:25:35 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/5] I2C Mux per channel bus speed

Hi Marcus,

> This series has been in its final shape for a while now.
> With multiple resends and pings on this series for the last four
> months, I think everyone interested has had the chance to review it.

So, if there are interested parties, please add tags like Rev-by or
Tested-by. Makes my life a lot easier. Currently, the core parts here
are unreviewed.

> Wolfram Sang, could you please take a look on this series and consider
> pick it up for merging? 

I do respect the work you put into this. However, I am super busy and
maintaining I2C is largely free-time work, so I can't give you any
promise. Believe me, I wish it would be different.

All the best,

   Wolfram