[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWZsAt8unYL6khJj@mail.minyard.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:00:02 -0600
From: Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
To: Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Manley <andrew.manley@...lingtech.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: ipmb: initialise event handler read bytes
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 05:41:34PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
> IPMB doesn't use i2c reads, but the handler needs to set a value.
> Otherwise an i2c read will return an uninitialised value from the bus
> driver.
This is fine, I suppose. It's probably better to do this.
Are you actually using this code? How was it found?
-corey
>
> Fixes: 63c4eb347164 ("ipmi:ipmb: Add initial support for IPMI over IPMB")
> Signed-off-by: Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> index 3a51e58b24875497699c7af7a4af1c73b47653f3..28818952a7a4bf814b95bdfb7046672ad4526cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> @@ -202,11 +202,16 @@ static int ipmi_ipmb_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
> break;
>
> case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
> + *val = 0xff;
> + ipmi_ipmb_check_msg_done(iidev);
> + break;
> +
> case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> ipmi_ipmb_check_msg_done(iidev);
> break;
>
> case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
> + *val = 0xff;
> break;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: b71e635feefc852405b14620a7fc58c4c80c0f73
> change-id: 20260113-ipmb-read-init-5b97dfbcd3b9
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists