[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91144915-1ca1-475f-9fc7-5eea18bdb39e@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:10:14 +0530
From: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, ldewangan@...dia.com,
digetx@...il.com, andi.shyti@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
akhilrajeev@...dia.com, smangipudi@...dia.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] i2c: tegra: Add logic to support different
register offsets
On 13/01/26 18:04, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2026 09:04, Kartik Rajput wrote:
>> Tegra410 use different offsets for existing I2C registers, update
>> the logic to use appropriate offsets per SoC.
>>
>> As the registers offsets are now also defined for dvc and vi, following
>> function are not required and they are removed:
>> - tegra_i2c_reg_addr(): No translation required.
>> - dvc_readl(): Replaced with i2c_readl().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> * Do not remove dvc_writel().
>> * Keep DVC registers defined as a macro.
>> * Correct Tegra20 DVC register offsets.
>> * Remove sl_cnfg, sl_addr1 and sl_addr2 registers for DVC and VI
>> as they are not used.
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Replace individual is_dvc and is_vi flags with an I2C variant.
>> * Add tegra20_dvc_i2c_hw and tegra210_vi_i2c_hw in a separate
>> patch.
>> * Use calculated offsets for tegra20_dvc_i2c_regs and
>> tegra210_vi_i2c_regs.
>> * Initialize registers only if they are used on the given SoC.
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 368 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 239 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
>> static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra256_i2c_hw = {
>> @@ -1937,6 +2045,7 @@ static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra256_i2c_hw = {
>> .enable_hs_mode_support = true,
>> .has_mutex = true,
>> .variant = TEGRA_I2C_VARIANT_DEFAULT,
>> + .regs = &tegra20_i2c_regs,
>> };
>
>
> Is this correct? Tegra256 sets 'has_mutex' to true but is using the tegra20_i2c_regs which does not define the 'sw_mutex' register.
>
> Jon
>
Hi Jon,
Yes, this is incorrect, we should be using tegra264_i2c_regs here. I will fix this in the next patch set.
Thanks,
Kartik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists