linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 30/44] fs: use min() or umin() instead of min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <79702729-b89d-44ea-833f-505bfb8b1309@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 19:10:31 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/44] fs: use min() or umin() instead of min_t()

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:33:46PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:41:26PM +0000, david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:

> > This breaks an arm imx_v6_v7_defconfig build:

> I hadn't tested 32bit when I sent the patch.
> It was noticed ages ago and I thought there was a patch (to fuse/file.c) that
> changed the code to avoid the 64bit signed maths on 32bit.

It's possible there's a patch out there somewhere but it's not present
in what's in -next.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)