[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a53fa501-dff1-4732-92c1-fab8e66ef886@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:23:14 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: weipeng <coderlogicwei@...il.com>
Cc: anna-maria@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [usb?] INFO: task hung in i2c_tiny_usb_disconnect
Hi,
On 13.01.26 16:47, weipeng wrote:
> @@ -287,9 +321,12 @@ static void i2c_tiny_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface)
> {
> struct i2c_tiny_usb *dev = usb_get_intfdata(interface);
>
> - i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->usb_lock);
> usb_set_intfdata(interface, NULL);
> - i2c_tiny_usb_free(dev);
> + dev->disconnected = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->usb_lock);
> +
> + queue_work(system_long_wq, &dev->release_work);
>
> dev_dbg(&interface->dev, "disconnected\n");
> }
what prevents the following sequence:
i2c_tiny_usb_disconnect() -> module unload -> i2c_tiny_usb_release()
As far as I can tell, this can happen and you'd execute already
freed memory.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists